Case 2410081/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Steele v Swissport Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2410081/2019
- Decision date
- 30 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Steele
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Horne found that Mr A Steele had suffered an unlawful deduction from wages on 28 March 2019. The respondent, Swissport, was ordered to pay £1,082.00, subject to such deductions as it was required to make for tax and national insurance.
The judgment does not set out separate findings on any other claim type or any disputed factual issue beyond the unlawful deduction finding. The hearing listed for 3 October 2019 was cancelled as a result of the judgment. The attached interest notice states the standard tribunal interest information and gives 30 September 2019 as the relevant decision day, but it does not record any separate interest award in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimant suffered an unlawful deduction of wages on 28 March 2019 and ordered payment of £1,082.00, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,082 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,082
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.