Case 2410082/2019 · Employment Tribunal

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 2410082/2019 Mr J Robertson v Represented by: Mr P McGowan Lookers Motor Group Limited — 2019

Case reference: 2410082/2019
Decision date: 5 November 2019
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge M MacLeod Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 2410082/2019 Mr J Robertson

Respondent

Represented by: Mr P McGowan Lookers Motor Group Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment records that Mr J Robertson's claim against Lookers Motor Group Limited was withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, the Employment Tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The decision contains no merits findings, no liability analysis, and no award of compensation or other remedy.

The only dated procedural information in the judgment is that it was issued on 5 November 2019 by Employment Judge M MacLeod Date and entered in the register the same day. The judgment does not identify any separate remedy issues or any protected characteristic issues.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.