Case 2410088/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Radcliffe v Spectrum Pub Group Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2410088/2022
- Decision date
- 17 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Radcliffe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore decided that a determination could properly be made under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 without a hearing on the merits.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's accrued untaken annual leave entitlement. It ordered Spectrum Pub Group Ltd to pay Miss H Radcliffe the gross sum of £455.61.
The written record also included the standard notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990. It stated that interest would not be payable if the sum was paid in full within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties, and that if unpaid interest would run from 18 April 2023 at 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's accrued untaken annual leave entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £455.61 under Rule 21 because no valid response was presented on time. | Upheld | — | £456 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £456
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.