Case 2410103/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v K&R Confectionery Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) and Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy — 2023
- Case reference
- 2410103/2022
- Decision date
- 14 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter Claimant
- Venue
- Liverpool Tribunal
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs C Clementson brought claims against K&R Confectionery Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) and the Secretary of State. The hearing took place by CVP on 7 March 2023 before Employment Judge Shotter. The claim for holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed without statutory notice. It held that her wrongful dismissal claim under section 182 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded, and that it had jurisdiction because the complaint had not been lodged out of time and, alternatively, because it was not reasonably practicable to lodge it in time. The tribunal awarded £615.09, calculated as four weeks less two days at £165.60 per week net, or £23.66 per day.
The tribunal also found the statutory redundancy payment claim under sections 166 and 170 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded. It found that the claimant had, within the six-month period in section 164(1), written to the first respondent, and that within the following six-month extension period she referred to the tribunal the question of her entitlement under section 164(2). The tribunal held that it was just and equitable for a redundancy payment to be made, and awarded £1,242, calculated at 1.5 weeks for four years at £207 gross. The total principal award recorded by the judgment was £1,857.09.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the holiday pay claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed without statutory notice and awarded compensation under section 182 ERA 1996, calculated as 4 weeks less 2 days at £165.60 per week net (£23.66 per day). | Upheld | — | £615 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the statutory redundancy payment claim well-founded under sections 166 and 170 ERA 1996 and awarded £1,242, calculated at 1.5 weeks for 4 years at £207 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,242 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,857
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- section 182 ERA 1996
- sections 166 and 170 ERA 1996
- section 164(1) ERA 1996
- section 164(2) ERA 1996
- not reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.