Case 2410104/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Woodcock v Everest Home Improvements Ltd and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2410104/2019
- Decision date
- 14 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr D Woodcock
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal stated that the claim was struck out. In reasons dated 9 June 2021, Employment Judge Phil Allen recorded that by a letter dated 12 May 2021 the tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, explaining why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal concluded that the claim should be struck out. No substantive liability findings were made and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not restate the pleaded cause of action, but the case was listed by GOV.UK as an unfair dismissal claim. The tribunal struck out the claim for failure to actively pursue it after giving the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.