Case 2410108/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Egan v Governing Body of Broadheath Primary School and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2410108/2022
- Decision date
- 24 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs T Egan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Mrs T Egan’s claim in Manchester over 19, 20, 21 and 22 March 2024 and 11 April 2024, against the Governing Body of Broadheath Primary School and Trafford Council. The written judgment records a claim framed as unfair dismissal by way of constructive dismissal under sections 95 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal held that the claim was not well-founded and dismissed it. The decision record does not set out substantive written reasons; it states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The written judgment records that the claimant’s claim that she was unfairly (constructively) dismissed pursuant to sections 95 and 98 Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well-founded and failed. The record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 95 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 98 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.