Case 2410112/2022 · Employment Tribunal
S Mayeli v ZM BJ Brands Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2410112/2022
- Decision date
- 23 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
S Mayeli
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge therefore made a determination under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On that basis, the tribunal decided the claim without a hearing on liability and recorded that the respondent had failed to respond in time.
The tribunal upheld the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages. It found that the claimant was owed wages for 40 hours per week at £9.50 per hour, equating to £380 per week, and that two weeks' pay was unpaid. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £760 gross for that claim.
The tribunal also upheld the claim for unpaid holiday entitlement. It calculated the daily rate as 8 hours at £9.50 per hour, being £76 per day, and applied statutory part-time holiday entitlement of 16.8 days. That produced an award of £1,276.80. A separate notice on interest stated that interest would apply under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 unless the sums were paid within 14 days of the written decision, with 23 February 2023 identified as the relevant decision day and 8% per annum as the stipulated rate.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £760 gross, calculated as 40 hours per week at £9.50 per hour for 2 weeks. | Upheld | — | £760 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,276.80, calculated by reference to an 8-hour day at £9.50 per hour and 16.8 days' statutory entitlement for part-time work. | Upheld | — | £1,277 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,037
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, Article 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.