Case 2410141/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Newman Lomax v Euxton Tile Supplies Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2410141/2022
- Decision date
- 17 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Newman Lomax
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that, by letter dated 23 June 2023, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons identified were that the claimant had not complied with case management orders made following the preliminary hearing on 12 April 2023, which he did not attend, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 13, 14 and 15 March 2024 will not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type(s). The entire claim was struck out after the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 23 June 2023, following non-compliance with case management orders and lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.