Case 2410146/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Corser v Cheeky Tikka Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2410146/2022
- Decision date
- 30 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Corser
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge M Butler heard the claim at Manchester on 17 May 2023. The respondent did not file a defence and did not attend the hearing. The tribunal recorded that the claimant, Mr M Corser, was subjected to an unauthorised deduction from wages.
The claim therefore succeeded. The tribunal awarded the claimant the net figure of £1,133.93. It also directed that the respondent was responsible for calculating the gross amount to be paid and for satisfying any tax payable on the wages owed, with the outstanding net balance of £1,133.93 to be paid to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the claimant was subjected to an unauthorised deduction from wages and awarded the net figure of £1,133.93. The respondent was directed to calculate the gross figure and satisfy any tax payable on the wages owed, with the outstanding net balance to be paid to the claimant. | Upheld | — | £1,134 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,134
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.