Case 2410147/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Williams v Creative Support Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2410147/2019
- Decision date
- 26 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharkett
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis record concerns only the respondent’s application under rule 20(1) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 for an extension of time to allow an ET3 to be presented. Employment Judge Sharkett, sitting alone at Manchester on 18 February 2020, allowed the application.
The written record states that reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing. No substantive employment claims or remedy findings are recorded in this judgment, and no monetary award is set out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Respondent's application under rule 20(1) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 for an extension of time to permit an ET3 succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 20(1) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.