Case 2410169/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Sharon-Ann Lambert v Galahad Legal and Financial Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2410169/2022
- Decision date
- 30 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Cowen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Sharon-Ann Lambert
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Manchester on 14 June 2023, Employment Judge L Cowen sat alone and heard Ms Sharon-Ann Lambert's claims against Galahad Legal and Financial. The tribunal dismissed the wrongful dismissal claim, describing it as ill-founded.
The tribunal upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim. It found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £81.25 in respect of the amount unlawfully deducted. The written record notes that oral reasons were given at the hearing; no further written reasons are included in the record provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal said the claim was 'ill-founded' and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £81.25. | Upheld | — | £81 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £81
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.