Case 2410195/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Chohan v Amey Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2410195/2018
- Decision date
- 22 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Chohan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNeither party attended the hearing. The Tribunal recorded that, over the weekend of 16 and 17 February 2019, the claimant withdrew all her claims.
On that basis, the Tribunal dismissed all claims upon withdrawal, including any claims of unfair dismissal, breach of contract and, if there were any such claims, sex discrimination. The Tribunal made no further order or direction.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant withdrew all her claims and that all claims, including any unfair dismissal claim, were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant withdrew all her claims and that all claims, including breach of contract, were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment refers to sex discrimination only conditionally, saying 'if there were any such claims'; the gov.uk listing category also indicates sex discrimination. Outcome recorded as withdrawn because the judgment dismissed all claims upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.