Case 2410195/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Edwards v Skydrivers Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2410195/2019
- Decision date
- 24 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Edwards
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Franey amended the respondent’s title to Skydrivers Ltd and made monetary awards on the papers. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages in respect of holiday pay and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,083.33.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,083.33. It further found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,218.74.
A standard notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 was attached, stating that sums unpaid within 14 days would carry interest, with the relevant decision day as 24 October 2019, the calculation day as 25 October 2019, and the stipulated rate as 8%. No separate quantified interest figure was set out in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award was for an unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £1,083 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract as to notice and awarded damages. | Upheld | — | £1,083 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £1,219 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,385
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.