Case 2410207/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Bromley v Carpenters Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2410207/2019
- Decision date
- 2 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Bromley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings in case 2410207/2019 were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not contain any findings on liability, evidence, or remedy, and it does not set out separate conclusions on any individual claim heads.
On the face of the judgment, the tribunal did not determine the substance of the dispute. The only recorded outcome is dismissal of the proceedings after withdrawal, so there is no merits decision on disability discrimination or unlawful deduction from wages in the text provided.
No compensation, interest, or other monetary award is recorded. The judgment is a short procedural disposal only.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not separate out any individual discrimination allegations or make findings on the merits. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not set out a separate determination on this head of claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.