Case 2410211/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Hartin v Coastal Home Care Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2410211/2019
- Decision date
- 5 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sherratt REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Hartin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Manchester on 16 October 2019 before Employment Judge Sherratt, with Miss K Hartin appearing in person and the respondent unrepresented, the tribunal upheld the claim for unlawful deduction from wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,177.85 gross, calculated in the judgment as £1,071 for 126 hours at £8.50 per hour plus £230 for travel, less £123.15 already paid on account.
The tribunal also upheld the claim for unpaid holiday pay and ordered a further gross payment of £170, described in the judgment as 20 hours x £8.50. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated time limit. Taken together, the awards total £1,347.85 before any interest that might arise under the standard notice if the sums were not paid within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as a gross sum of £1,177.85, calculated by the tribunal as £1,071 for 126 hours at £8.50 per hour plus £230 for travel, less £123.15 paid on account. | Upheld | — | £1,178 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as a gross sum of £170, calculated by the tribunal as 20 hours x £8.50. | Upheld | — | £170 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,348
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.