Case 2410230/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Foley v NFT Distribution Operations Ltd (In Administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2410230/2019
- Decision date
- 14 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Foley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge McDonald struck out Mrs D Foley's claim against NFT Distribution Operations Ltd (in Administration). The tribunal recorded that the respondent was in administration and that neither the consent of the Administrator nor permission of the court had been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal also noted that on 9 October 2020 it had given the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for want of active pursuit. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason. On that basis, the claim was struck out. No merits findings were made and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim struck out because the respondent was in administration and the required consent of the Administrator or permission of the court had not been obtained under the Insolvency Act 1986. The tribunal also noted that the claimant did not give an acceptable reason after being given an opportunity on 9 October 2020 to explain why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.