Case 2410261/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Crutchley v The Together Trust and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 2410261/2019
- Decision date
- 4 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs D Crutchley
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 18 January 2020, the Tribunal gave Mrs D Crutchley an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were non-compliance with the Tribunal's order of 11 November 2019 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37.
The hearing listed for 11 February to 14 February 2020 did not take place because the claim had been struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying issues or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim types. It records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37 because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 11 November 2019 and the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.