Case 2410263/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Jellicoe v Red Lion Parkgate Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2410263/2019
- Decision date
- 4 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barker REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G Jellicoe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 15 November 2019 in Liverpool before Employment Judge Barker, the parties informed the tribunal that they had agreed terms to settle the matter. The judgment records that the settlement terms were not disclosed to the tribunal and were not the subject of any judicial determination.
The tribunal did not determine the merits of the underlying claims. Instead, it stayed the proceedings until 17 February 2020 to allow time for payment of the agreed sum by the respondent.
The order provided that if neither party applied to reinstate the proceedings on or before 17 February 2020, the matter would be deemed dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant on that date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is a consent judgment recording that the parties had agreed terms for settlement. The terms were not disclosed and there was no judicial determination of the underlying claims. The order stayed the matter until 17 February 2020, with dismissal by withdrawal if no reinstatement application was made by that date. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.