Case 2410274/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Broderick v Park Hall Hotel (Wolverhampton) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2410274/2022
- Decision date
- 16 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Broderick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn a Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Leach recorded that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £461.76 for 1-10 March 2023, being 8 working days. The tribunal also found a breach of contract in failing to pay pension contributions into a pension scheme for the claimant’s benefit and awarded damages of £1,805.55.
The tribunal further held that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £202.02. It found that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,333.33, and it also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement, ordering £173.16. The listed awards together total £5,975.82.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages for 1-10 March 2023 (8 working days). | Upheld | — | £462 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract for failing to pay pension contributions into a pension scheme for the claimant’s benefit. | Upheld | — | £1,806 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £202 |
| Redundancy | Dismissed by reason of redundancy and found entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £3,333 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £173 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,976
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.