Case 2410287/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Steven Stirrup v Ron Lysons — 2019
- Case reference
- 2410287/2019
- Decision date
- 31 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hoey Representatives
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Steven Stirrup
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public hearing in Manchester on 4 December 2019 before Employment Judge Hoey, the parties agreed by consent and in accordance with rule 64 of Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 that the claims before the Tribunal would be settled. The extracted judgment does not contain findings on liability for any pleaded claim.
The respondent agreed to pay the claimant a total of £2,000 in settlement, payable in two instalments of £1,000 each, with the first instalment due on 4 January 2020 and the second on 4 February 2020. The judgment records the settlement only and does not apportion the sum between individual claims or record any separate award components.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the claims before the Tribunal were settled by consent under rule 64; the extracted text does not set out any liability findings on this claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claims before the Tribunal were settled by consent under rule 64; the extracted text does not set out any liability findings on this claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the claims before the Tribunal were settled by consent under rule 64; the extracted text does not set out any liability findings on this claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the claims before the Tribunal were settled by consent under rule 64; the extracted text does not set out any liability findings on this claim. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.