Case 2410297/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Martin v Miles Fox Haulage Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2410297/2019
- Decision date
- 7 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Representatives
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Martin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 21 October 2019 at Manchester, Employment Judge Holmes recorded a consent judgment in the claim brought by Mr A Martin against Miles Fox Haulage Ltd. The judgment states that terms of settlement had been agreed between the parties.
The tribunal ordered that the proceedings be stayed for implementation of those terms until 1 November 2019. The judgment further recorded that, with the claimant's consent, the claims would stand dismissed upon withdrawal by him. No substantive findings on the merits and no monetary award are recorded in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Consent judgment recorded that terms of settlement had been agreed; proceedings were stayed for implementation until 1 November 2019, when the claims were to stand dismissed upon the claimant's withdrawal. | Settled | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Consent judgment recorded that terms of settlement had been agreed; proceedings were stayed for implementation until 1 November 2019, when the claims were to stand dismissed upon the claimant's withdrawal. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.