Case 2410299/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Dr C Moloney v Rochdale Metropolitan Council and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 2410299/2019
- Decision date
- 25 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Feeney REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Dr C Moloney
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Manchester on 18 February 2020, before Employment Judge Feeney, the tribunal dealt with the claimant's unfair dismissal claim only. The claimant was not in attendance; the respondents were represented by Miss L Quigley, Counsel. The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim as having no reasonable prospect of success.
The judgment expressly states that the claimant's public interest disclosure claim was unaffected by this decision and continues. No remedy was assessed or awarded in this judgment, and the written record notes that oral reasons were given at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim as having no reasonable prospect of success. The judgment states that the claimant's public interest disclosure claim was unaffected and continues. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.