Case 2410313/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Slater v RGM Norton Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2410313/2022
- Decision date
- 19 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Slater
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment heard by Employment Judge Shotter at Liverpool (by CVP) on 8 April 2024. The respondent did not enter an ET3 and did not attend. The Tribunal noted that the respondent had changed its name from RGM Motors Cumbria Limited to RGM Motors Limited on 16 April 2023 and recorded the correct name accordingly.
On the holiday pay claim, the Judge heard oral evidence on affirmation from the claimant and considered documents including wage slips. The Tribunal was satisfied that the claimant, paid £10, worked until the effective date of termination of 18 August 2022 and had not been paid her accrued holiday entitlement at termination.
The claim of accrued unpaid holiday for the year 1 January to 18 August 2022 was found well founded. The respondent was ordered to pay 10 days holiday totalling £825 gross, less 20 percent tax and national insurance, equating to £660 net.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment (no ET3 entered). Tribunal found 10 days accrued unpaid holiday for year 1 January to 18 August 2022; £825 gross less 20% tax and NI = £660 net. | Upheld | — | £660 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £660
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.