Case 2410334/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Vogwell v Jimmy’s LPL Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2410334/2021
- Decision date
- 18 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Vogwell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Vogwell brought a claim against Jimmy’s LPL Limited for unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. At the hearing before Employment Judge Ross on 13 January 2022, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal allowed the claimant’s application to amend the claim so that it included her full four-week notice period.
The tribunal held that the claim was well-founded and succeeded. It found that the respondent had unlawfully shortened the claimant’s contractual notice period as a bar manager from four weeks to one week. It also found that the claimant was entitled to full pay under her contract of employment during her absence for COVID-19.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £2,191 within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no further written reasons would be provided unless requested in time. The interest notice attached to the judgment recorded the relevant decision day as 18 January 2022 and the stipulated rate of interest as 8%, but no separate interest sum was set out in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant’s application to amend was allowed so the claim covered her full four-week notice period. The tribunal found the respondent unlawfully shortened the notice period to one week and also found the claimant was entitled to full pay during her COVID-19 absence. | Upheld | — | £2,191 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,191
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.