Case 2410360/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Labrow v IT Parts & Spares Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2410360/2022
- Decision date
- 21 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eeley Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Labrow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public CVP hearing on 17 November 2023 before Employment Judge Eeley, neither party attended and neither was represented. The tribunal recorded that all of the claimant’s claims in case 2410360/2022 were presented outside the primary limitation period.
Because the claimant did not attend and provided no evidence, the tribunal said it could not exercise its statutory discretion to extend the time limits and hear the claims out of time. On that basis, all claims were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
The judgment does not set out any monetary award or any separate remedy findings. It was sent to the parties on 21 November 2023.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Judgment states all claims were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because they were presented outside the primary limitation period; the specific claim type is inferred from the published case listing. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Judgment states all claims were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because they were presented outside the primary limitation period; the specific claim type is inferred from the published case listing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment states all claims were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because they were presented outside the primary limitation period; the specific claim type is inferred from the published case listing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.