Case 2410361/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Galvin v Guild Energy Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2410361/2019
- Decision date
- 30 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Galvin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike out judgment heard at Liverpool by CVP on 11 November 2020 before Employment Judge Benson. The judgment states that all claims were struck out under rule 37 because the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 16 December 2019 requiring further particulars of his claims, and because the claims had not been actively pursued.
The judgment does not set out any substantive determination of liability on the underlying complaints. No remedy was awarded, and the decision disposes of the claims procedurally rather than on their merits. The judgment was sent to the parties on 30 November 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | All claims were struck out because the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 16 December 2019 to provide further particulars of his claims, and because the claims had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | All claims were struck out because the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 16 December 2019 to provide further particulars of his claims, and because the claims had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.