Case 2410367/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Willetts v Toy Fight Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2410367/2021
- Decision date
- 4 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Willetts
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant’s unfair dismissal complaint did not proceed to a merits determination. The tribunal recorded that the claim was dismissed on withdrawal, because the claimant had withdrawn the complaint by email dated 24 January 2022.
The claimant also pursued disability discrimination claims. The tribunal held that he had not satisfied it that he had a disability within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010, and on that basis struck out the disability discrimination claims in their entirety.
The judgment records that there were no outstanding claims after those dispositions, and the final hearing dates of 25, 26 and 27 January 2023 were vacated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed on withdrawal and that the claimant withdrew the complaint by email dated 24 January 2022. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found that the claimant had not satisfied it that he had a disability within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010, and struck out the disability discrimination claims in their entirety. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.