Case 2410383/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Chesworth v Sefton Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 2410383/2019
- Decision date
- 5 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspinall REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Chesworth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Liverpool on 11 October 2019 before Employment Judge Aspinall, the tribunal did not determine the merits of the dispute. Instead, it issued an unless order stating that unless the claimant wrote to the tribunal by 30 October 2019 requesting a preliminary hearing for case management, the claim(s) in case 2410383/2019 would be dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant on 30 October 2019 without further recourse to the parties.
The written record sent to the parties on 5 November 2019 notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent. No substantive findings on liability, remedy, or the underlying factual dispute are recorded in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type in the text provided. It made an unless order that, if the claimant did not write by 30 October 2019 requesting a preliminary hearing for case management, the claim(s) would be dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant on 30 October 2019 without further recourse to the parties. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.