Case 2410424/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr JF Lamb v Governing Body Of Blue Coat School — 2019
- Case reference
- 2410424/2019
- Decision date
- 2 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr JF Lamb
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn case numbers 2410424/2019 and 2410395/2019, Employment Judge Franey recorded that the proceedings in both cases were dismissed after the claimant withdrew the claims. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on liability or any remedy award.
The extracted text does not separately set out the pleaded claims or give reasons for the withdrawal, so the public record is limited to the withdrawal-based dismissal itself. The judgment was signed on 25 October 2019 and sent to the parties on 2 November 2019.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The extracted judgment text does not specify the pleaded claim; classification follows the supplied case context. The judgment records only that the proceedings were dismissed after withdrawal of the claims by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The extracted judgment text does not specify the pleaded claim; classification follows the supplied case context. The judgment records only that the proceedings were dismissed after withdrawal of the claims by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment text does not specify the pleaded claim; classification follows the supplied case context. The judgment records only that the proceedings were dismissed after withdrawal of the claims by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.