Case 2410434/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Hamlet v Crystal Architectural Aluminium Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2410434/2021
- Decision date
- 11 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Hamlet
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 29 September 2022 before Employment Judge Slater, the tribunal recorded a preliminary jurisdiction ruling on the Equality Act 2010 complaints. It held that it had jurisdiction to consider those complaints only if the matters before the dismissal date, 27 February 2021, were part of a continuing act of discrimination ending with the dismissal. The tribunal said that issue would be determined at the final hearing.
The only complaint disposed of in this written judgment was victimisation under the Equality Act 2010. That complaint was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. No merits finding was made on the underlying Equality Act complaints in this decision, and no remedy was assessed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | The tribunal recorded that the victimisation complaint under the Equality Act 2010 was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.