Case 2410436/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Walker v Best Dressed Group Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2410436/2019
- Decision date
- 4 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Walker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Batten sat alone in Manchester on 12 March 2020 and 17 July 2020. The tribunal held that Mr G Walker's claim for wrongful dismissal against Best Dressed Group Limited succeeded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay compensation of £20,270.28. The award was broken down as £17,666.66 salary, £1,236.66 pension contributions, £1,148.33 car allowance and £218.63 accommodation costs.
The extracted text also includes the standard interest notice, stating that the relevant decision day was 3 August 2020, the calculation day was 4 August 2020, and the stipulated rate of interest was 8%. No separate reasons for liability or a separate interest calculation are set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The extracted judgment text records the order and compensation breakdown but does not include separate reasons. | Upheld | — | £20,270 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,270
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £20,270
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.