Case 2410498/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Elenore Walker v Assured Estate Agents Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2410498/2021
- Decision date
- 14 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wheat REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Elenore Walker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Elenore Walker brought an unlawful deduction from wages claim against Assured Estate Agents Ltd. The tribunal recorded that, by consent, the respondent was ordered to repay £200.48 to the claimant. The judgment states that this figure was gross and that tax and national insurance contributions would need to be deducted from it if due.
The claimant also pursued a further allegation of unauthorised deduction from wages in the sum of £89.10, described as 10 hours' work at £8.91 per hour. The tribunal found that this further claim was not well founded and dismissed it.
The hearing was conducted remotely by CVP before Employment Judge Wheat sitting alone. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record notes the standard interest notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, with the relevant judgment day identified as 14 January 2022 and the stipulated rate of interest as 8%.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the tribunal ordered repayment of the deduction of £200.48 gross, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance contributions due. | Settled | — | £200 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant's further allegation of an unauthorised deduction of £89.10, said to represent 10 hours' work at £8.91 per hour, was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £200
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.