Case 2410548/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Cox v Inkcomparable Print Solutions Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2410548/2019
- Decision date
- 24 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Cox
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 8 August 2020, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out because they had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that the claimant did not make any written representations and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Holmes struck out the claims under rule 37. No substantive findings were made on the merits of the underlying claims, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Struck out under rule 37 because the claimant did not make representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter dated 8 August 2020. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Struck out under rule 37 because the claimant did not make representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter dated 8 August 2020. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.