Case 2410655/2019 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs A Bowen v Tenon FM Limited — 2020

Case reference: 2410655/2019
Decision date: 6 January 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge McDonald Representation
Venue: Manchester

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs A Bowen

Respondent

Tenon FM Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

By consent, the tribunal recorded that the claimant's complaint of unlawful deductions from wages succeeded. The judgment specifies five agreed components: £105.72 for underpayment of wages during suspension from 1 to 18 December 2018, £79.28 for underpayment of sick pay for 19 to 31 December 2019, £122.44 for underpayment of wages from 1 to 3 April 2019, £52.65 for notice pay, and £11.70 for holiday pay.

The total of the agreed sums is £371.79. The judgment did not apportion a separate award by legal claim beyond those listed components, and it did not record any compensatory, basic award, or injury to feelings element.

The same document states that judgment on the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint was reserved. No substantive findings on unfair dismissal are contained in this record, so no outcome is extracted for that complaint from this judgment.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	By consent, the claimant's complaint that the respondent made unlawful deductions from wages succeeded. The judgment lists the agreed sums as £105.72 for underpayment of wages during suspension from 1-18 December 2018, £79.28 for underpayment of sick pay in the period 19-31 December 2019, £122.44 for underpayment of wages from 1-3 April 2019, £52.65 for notice pay, and £11.70 for holiday pay.	Settled	—	£372

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £372; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.