Case 2410660/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Y Khan v Penipride I.E.Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2410660/2019
- Decision date
- 20 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Y Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Manchester before Employment Judge Slater, found that Penipride I.E. Ltd had made an unlawful deduction from Ms Y Khan's wages. The tribunal accepted that the respondent had agreed to pay her for extra hours worked and had not paid the gross sum due. It ordered payment of £374 as the total sum unlawfully deducted.
The tribunal also recorded, by consent, an order that the respondent pay £6.72 in damages for breach of contract. That sum related to reimbursement of expenses for a sample purchase of £4 and business mileage of £2.72. The written record does not set out any further findings on liability or any separate award of interest in monetary terms.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had agreed to pay the claimant for extra hours worked but failed to do so, resulting in an unlawful deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £374 |
| Breach of contract | By consent, the respondent was ordered to pay damages for failing to reimburse expenses consisting of a sample purchase (£4) and business mileage (£2.72). | Settled | — | £7 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £381
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.