Case 2410712/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Barrett v Mr Anthony Mark Cutter — 2019
- Case reference
- 2410712/2019
- Decision date
- 7 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Barrett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn a Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Slater found that Mr Anthony Mark Cutter had made unauthorised deductions from Miss S Barrett’s wages and had failed to pay her holiday entitlement. The tribunal ordered payment of £881.75 gross for the wages deduction claim and £1,045.75 for the holiday entitlement claim.
The judgment also recorded that the hearing listed for 9 December 2019 was cancelled. The attached interest notice stated that statutory interest would apply if the sums remained unpaid after the relevant decision day, with 7 November 2019 recorded as the relevant decision day, 8 November 2019 as the calculation day, and 8% as the stipulated rate, but no separate interest figure was quantified in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £882 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,046 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,928
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.