Case 2410734/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Stott Mr S Kendall v J D MacAdam & Son (Rescue) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2410734/2019
- Decision date
- 3 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Stott Mr S Kendall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the remote preliminary hearing on 29 and 30 June 2020, the tribunal held that Mr A Stott and Mr S Kendall were not entitled to be paid standby payments for time at night when they were required to be available should they be called upon. On that basis, the claims for unlawful deductions from wages based on alleged non-payment of the national minimum wage in respect of those standby payments did not succeed.
The tribunal recorded that Mr Stott had remaining claims which were to be determined at a final hearing listed for 10 and 11 September 2020. Mr Kendall had no remaining claims, and his claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimants were not entitled to be paid standby payments for night-time periods when they had to be available if called upon, so the unlawful deductions / national minimum wage complaint about those payments failed. Mr Stott's other claims were left for a later final hearing; Mr Kendall had no remaining claims and his claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.