Case 2410747/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E Grindall v Allansons LLP — 2020
- Case reference
- 2410747/2019
- Decision date
- 15 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sherratt
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E Grindall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mrs E Grindall had suffered an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered Allansons LLP to pay £221.67 gross. It also found that she had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £739.46 gross for that claim.
In addition, the tribunal found that Mrs Grindall had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,108.40. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay her holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £147.78 gross. The judgment records the awards separately and does not set out any further reasoning beyond the stated findings.
The total monetary awards recorded in the judgment come to £2,217.31 gross. The separate interest notice states the relevant decision day as 15 January 2020, with interest to run from 16 January 2020 if the sums were not paid within 14 days, at the stipulated rate of 8%.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,108 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £148 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £222 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £739 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,217
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.