Case 2410748/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Clayton v Allansons LLP — 2020
- Case reference
- 2410748/2019
- Decision date
- 15 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sherratt
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Clayton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Sherratt found that Miss M Clayton had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The tribunal ordered the respondent, Allansons LLP, to pay damages to the claimant in the gross sum of £288.97 for that notice breach.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £462.00 gross for that sum. The written judgment was sent to the parties on 15 January 2020, and the accompanying notice stated that interest would accrue on unpaid sums in accordance with the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if payment was not made within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered gross damages of £288.97. | Upheld | — | £289 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £462 gross. | Upheld | — | £462 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £751
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.