Case 2410750/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Fray v Allansons LLP — 2020
- Case reference
- 2410750/2019
- Decision date
- 15 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sherratt
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Fray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was determined on written representation for the claimant and no response was presented by the respondent. Employment Judge Sherratt recorded four separate monetary claims and found for the claimant on each of them.
First, the tribunal held that Allansons LLP had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered it to pay £1,500 gross. It also held that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £3,810.62 gross damages for that claim.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,715.93. It also found a failure to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,038.45. The combined sum of the awards is £12,065.00.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,500 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,500 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £3,810.62 gross damages. | Upheld | — | £3,811 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,715.93. | Upheld | — | £5,716 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,038.45. | Upheld | — | £1,038 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,065
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.