Case 2410760/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Gibson v Timber and Canvas Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2410760/2019
- Decision date
- 26 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Gibson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment on the papers under rule 60 in case 2410760/2019, with Employment Judge Howard Date sitting alone. The claimant, Mr B Gibson, brought a claim against Timber and Canvas Limited for unlawful deduction from pay under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal held that the unlawful deduction from pay claim succeeded. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,272.88. The judgment does not set out any separate liability analysis beyond that finding, and it records the award as a single sum.
The notice to the judgment explains that interest may become payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the award is not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day. The relevant decision day was recorded as 26 November 2019 and the calculation day as 27 November 2019, with the stipulated rate of interest stated as 8%.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment on the papers under rule 60. The tribunal stated that the claimant's unlawful deduction from pay claim pursuant to Part II Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeds and ordered payment of £1,272.88. | Upheld | — | £1,273 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,273
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.