Case 2410770/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Payne v New Cadishead Cars Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2410770/2023
- Decision date
- 19 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Payne
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Ms T Payne had been dismissed and fixed the effective date of termination at 14 June 2023. It recorded that her claim for one week’s unpaid notice pay had been conceded by the respondent, found that claim well founded, and ordered New Cadishead Cars Limited to pay £323.02, described as one week’s gross pay, within 21 days.
The tribunal dismissed the claim for holiday pay accrued after 14 June 2023 and the claim that sick pay was owed for any period after that date. The written record also included the tribunal’s standard notice on interest, stating that the relevant decision day was 19 March 2024, the calculation day was 20 March 2024, and the stipulated rate was 8% per annum if any award remained unpaid after 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | One week’s unpaid notice pay; the respondent conceded the claim. The sum was agreed to represent one week’s gross pay. | Upheld | — | £323 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for holiday pay accrued after 14 June 2023. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claim that the claimant was owed sick pay for any period after 14 June 2023; the extracted judgment does not specify the legal basis. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £323
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.