Case 2410771/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Z Dutton v K Riley Entertainments Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2410771/2023
- Decision date
- 25 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Z Dutton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 27 September 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 22 August 2024 and for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records no findings on the underlying merits of the pleaded issues and no monetary award.
The decision was signed by Employment Judge McDonald on 22 October 2024 and sent to the parties on 25 October 2024.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 22 August 2024 and did not actively pursue the claim. It does not separate any remedy by claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 22 August 2024 and did not actively pursue the claim. It does not separate any remedy by claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.