Case 2410777/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Leavey v Secretary of State for Business & Trade — 2025
- Case reference
- 2410777/2023
- Decision date
- 14 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Porter Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Leavey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the claimant's employer, Fluttr Limited, committed a fundamental breach of contract which entitled the claimant to resign. It found that the claimant did resign in response to that breach on 19 August 2021, and that she was dismissed with an effective date of termination of 19 August 2021.
The Tribunal recorded that the claimant had been employed by Fluttr Limited from 1 June 2021 and had made a claim for three months' notice pay to the respondent and to the Tribunal as a breach of contract claim for failure to pay notice pay. It found that Fluttr Limited was liable to pay the claimant an amount for the notice period required by section 86(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. No monetary award was stated in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records the claim as breach of contract/failure to pay notice pay and finds that Fluttr Limited was liable to pay an amount for the statutory notice period, but it does not state a monetary figure. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 86(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.