Case 2410782/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Parry v Jean Mira / Bury Aces — 2019
- Case reference
- 2410782/2019
- Decision date
- 1 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Parry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings in case 2410782/2019 were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No findings on the merits are set out in the extracted text, and no remedy was awarded.
The document identifies the respondent as Jean Mira / Bury Aces and is signed by Employment Judge Howard on 19 September 2019, with sent date 1 October 2019. The extracted text does not record any separate liability decision, legal reasoning, or factual findings beyond the withdrawal and dismissal.
Because the judgment contains no substantive analysis, the extracted record treats the listed tribunal categories as withdrawn and records no award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The judgment text does not set out separate liability findings. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The judgment text does not set out separate liability findings. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.