Case 2410787/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Taylor v Phoenix Healthcare Distribution Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2410787/2019
- Decision date
- 20 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Taylor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard in Liverpool on 28, 29 and 30 October 2020 before Employment Judge Shotter. The claimant was Mrs C Taylor and the respondent was Phoenix Healthcare Distribution Ltd. The judgment recorded no findings of a separate monetary remedy or award.
The tribunal held that the respondent was not in breach of contract and that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed. It also held that the claimant's claim for constructive unfair dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed that claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal stated that the respondent was not in breach of contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal stated that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal stated that the constructive unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.