Case 2410789/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Wells v Supreme Recreation Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2410789/2019
- Decision date
- 16 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Wells
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 13 December 2019, Employment Judge Ainscough sat alone. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal held that Mr D Wells worked as a chef for Supreme Recreation Ltd from 17 July 2018 to 20 June 2019, that he was guaranteed 35 hours per week at £7.70 per hour, and that he worked five days a week. The holiday year ran from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2019.
The claimant’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeded. The tribunal awarded gross sums for unpaid wages for 7 June 2019 to 13 June 2019, unpaid wages for 14 June 2019 to 17 June 2019, one day of the notice period, average overtime for 7 June 2019 to 20 June 2019, and accrued holiday pay to 20 June 2019. Those items totalled £1,386 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had not been provided with written particulars of employment. Under section 38(4) of the Employment Act 2002, it made an award equivalent to four weeks' gross pay, assessed at £1,078. The written record states that interest would apply if sums were not paid within 14 days, but it does not record a separate interest figure in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal awarded gross sums for non-payment of wages from 7 June 2019 to 13 June 2019 (£269.50), from 14 June 2019 to 17 June 2019 (£215.60), for one day of the notice period (£53.90), for non-payment of average overtime from 7 June 2019 to 20 June 2019 (£146.30), and for accrued holiday pay up to 20 June 2019 (£700.70). | Upheld | — | £1,386 |
| Other | The claimant was not provided with written particulars of employment. The tribunal made an award under section 38(4) of the Employment Act 2002 equivalent to 4 weeks' gross pay. | Upheld | — | £1,078 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,386
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38(4) Employment Act 2002
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.