Case 2410816/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Atifa Hidari v The Big Initiative Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2410816/2023
- Decision date
- 19 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Atifa Hidari
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely on 14 December 2023 before Employment Judge Tobin sitting alone. The judgment records that Miss Atifa Hidari was dismissed in breach of contract, which the tribunal expressed as wrongful dismissal, and that she was therefore owed notice pay.
The tribunal ordered The Big Initiative Limited to pay £7,500 gross. The judgment states that the respondent could make deductions for tax and national insurance if appropriate, provided it gave the claimant written confirmation. A separate interest notice stated that if the award was not paid within 14 days of the written record being sent, interest would accrue from 20 December 2023 at 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract, i.e. wrongfully dismissed, and was owed notice pay. The award was £7,500 gross, with deduction for tax and national insurance if appropriate and written confirmation to the claimant. | Upheld | — | £7,500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.