Case 2410829/2019 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Miss G Masiello v Panshop Limited and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 2410829/2019
- Decision date
- 26 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
3 namedClaimant
(1) Miss G Masiello
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal stayed all claims against the first respondent. As to A & M Advisory Services Limited, it found that the claimant had suffered an unauthorised deduction from wages for pay in May 2019 and ordered payment of £1,500 gross, and a further unauthorised deduction in respect of additional hours worked between 1 February and 23 May 2019, for which it ordered £2,769.12 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £1,315 net damages, and that holiday entitlement had not been paid, awarding £657.40 gross. The written record states that all claims brought under case number 2410889/2019 were withdrawn and dismissed, and notes that the reasons were given orally at the hearing so no written reasons are provided in the record.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of pay for May 2019; ordered as a gross sum. | Upheld | — | £1,500 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of additional hours worked between 1 February and 23 May 2019; ordered as a gross sum. | Upheld | — | £2,769 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages awarded as a net sum. | Upheld | — | £1,315 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement; ordered as a gross sum. | Upheld | — | £657 |
| Other | All claims brought under case number 2410889/2019 were withdrawn and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,242
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.