Case 2410834/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms F Hussain v Manchester City Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 2410834/2023
- Decision date
- 13 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Mrs SA Humphreys, Mr M Stemp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms F Hussain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs F Hussain’s case was heard at Manchester on 22, 23 and 24 April 2025 before Employment Judge KM Ross, Tribunal Member Mrs SA Humphreys and Tribunal Member Mr M Stemp. In the written judgment record, the tribunal dismissed the claimant’s indirect sex discrimination claim, stating that it was not well founded.
The tribunal also dismissed the claimant’s unfair constructive dismissal claim, again stating that it was not well founded. The written record notes that reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing, but no written reasons are included in the published extract.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Claim pleaded and recorded as indirect sex discrimination; the tribunal held it was not well founded. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Claim pleaded and recorded as unfair constructive dismissal; the tribunal held it was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.